A Belfast man has been fined after his escaped dog attacked and injured a five-year-old child in a street in the Broomhill Park area.
Belfast City Council said Lucas Bjorkman-Loney, of Broomhill Park, Belfast, was sentenced at Belfast Magistrates Court on Tuesday 2 June 2026 after being convicted of an offence involving a dog attacking a person. The case followed an incident on 27 June 2025 in which a Pointer-type dog escaped from premises and injured the boy’s leg.
For residents, the case is a reminder that dog control offences can lead to prosecution when an animal escapes and causes injury in a public place. Anyone responsible for a dog is expected to keep it under proper control at home, at boundaries and while outside.
Court penalties after the Belfast prosecution
Mr Bjorkman-Loney was convicted under Article 29(2) of The Dogs (Northern Ireland) Order 1983.
The court imposed a fine of £750. He was also ordered to pay a compensation order totalling £500, along with £132 in legal and court costs.
Belfast City Council brought the prosecution after reports of the attack were made. The council’s statement, dated 3 June 2026, confirmed the sentencing took place the previous day at Belfast Magistrates Court.

The outcome places the case within Northern Ireland’s dog control framework, where owners can face legal consequences if a dog attacks and injures a person. A related local report on a Belfast dog owner fined after a child was injured sets out the same court outcome for residents following the case.
How the child was injured in Broomhill Park
The incident happened on 27 June 2025 after the Pointer-type dog escaped from premises at Broomhill Park.
According to the council, the dog attacked a five-year-old boy in the street and caused injuries to his leg. The source statement did not give further medical details about the child’s injuries.
The location matters because the attack happened after the animal had left the property. Dog control cases often turn on whether the owner or keeper had taken reasonable steps to prevent an animal from getting loose and posing a risk to other people.
In residential streets, that can include secure gates, garden boundaries, doors and any other access point from which a dog could escape. The court outcome underlines that the legal responsibility does not begin only once a dog is being walked in public.

The law used in the case
The Dogs (Northern Ireland) Order 1983 is the legislation cited in the conviction. Article 29(2) covers offences involving a dog attacking a person.
Belfast City Council’s role in the case was as the prosecuting authority. Local councils in Northern Ireland have responsibilities connected to dog control, including enforcement action where reported incidents meet the legal threshold for prosecution.
The sentence did not remove the fact that the victim was a child. Reporting on cases involving children requires care, particularly where the official source provides limited detail and where the court outcome, rather than graphic description, is the public record.
Dog control and public safety in Belfast streets
The immediate public safety point is practical: a dog that escapes from private premises can quickly become a risk in a shared street, even when an owner did not intend harm.
Residents who keep dogs should check that gates close properly, fences are not damaged and visitors or deliveries cannot accidentally leave a route open. Families, neighbours and passers-by may be the first people exposed if an animal gets out.
Reports of dog attacks or uncontrolled dogs should be made through the appropriate local channels so incidents can be assessed. In this case, the reported attack led to a council prosecution, a conviction, a fine, compensation and court costs recorded at Belfast Magistrates Court.
Source: Belfast Scraper
Source check Source trail
This report is based on Belfast City Council’s published notice about the Belfast Magistrates Court sentencing.
- Checked the stated sentencing date: Tuesday 2 June 2026.
- Matched the offence to Article 29(2) of The Dogs (Northern Ireland) Order 1983 as cited by...
- Separated confirmed court penalties from broader public safety context.
- Kept injury details limited to the council’s account of leg injuries to a five-year-old bo...
- Source
- Belfast City Council
- Scope
- Belfast
- Updated
- 2026-06-04 21:15
Source check
Report a trust issue
Send a clear signal to community moderation if the source, facts or context need review.
Comments